In the worked example below, a bad hire on a $100K role costs roughly $99K to $149K once you add salary burned, recruiting redo, manager time and team drag. Most founders only count salary. That understates the bill by half or more. You stop repeating it with a scorecard, structured interviews and a search process you run the same way twice.
The number you think it is
Six months in a $100K seat is about $50K in base, plus about 43 percent for benefits and payroll taxes. Call it about $71,500 for the months they stayed. That number feels complete. It is not.
It ignores the first search you already paid for, the manager hours, the rework the team absorbed, the second search and the quiet cost when good people leave because the wrong person slowed them down.
The number it actually is
- Salary and benefits burned while the wrong person was in seat.
- Recruiting redo. Agency redo at 20% of salary, often 25 to 30% for senior roles, or a Flat-fee Search at $5,000 to $12,000 per role ($12,000 for roles paying $150,000 or more).
- Manager time. Interviewing, onboarding, coaching, documenting, exiting. Forty to eighty hours is common.
- Team drag. Rework, missed deadlines, support load shifted sideways.
- Morale and turnover contagion. Hard to line-item, expensive when it hits.
Worked example: $100K role, six months, then exit
| Line | Low | High |
|---|---|---|
| Loaded pay for about 6 months (salary plus 43 percent) | $71,500 | $71,500 |
| First search (already spent) | $9,000 flat | $20,000 agency |
| Redo search | $9,000 flat | $20,000 agency |
| Manager time (value) | $4,000 | $12,000 |
| Rework / missed output | $5,000 | $25,000 |
| Directionally all-in | about $99K | about $149K |
Your numbers will move. The shape rarely does: salary is not the whole story.
Run your own inputs on the cost-per-hire calculator.
Stuck on this at your company?
Twenty minutes. We’ll tell you what to fix first, and whether we’re the ones to fix it.
Book a free 20-minute HR checkWhy first hires go wrong
Early hires are made under urgency. The scorecard is a vibe. Interviews are conversational, not comparable. References are polite. Nobody owns a structured “no.” The same company then repeats the pattern on hire three and hire seven, and calls it a talent market problem.
How to stop repeating it
- Write a scorecard before the posting. Must-haves, nice-to-haves and disqualifiers. If you cannot score it, you cannot hire it.
- Use the same interview loop for every finalist. Same core questions, written notes, independent scores before the debrief.
- Separate selling from assessing. Charm is not evidence.
- Price the search honestly. Flat-fee senior help often beats a panic agency percentage when you need quality without overspending. See flat-fee recruiting vs the agency percentage.
- Onboard like you mean it. A bad process after a good hire still produces a “bad hire” story.
If hiring is where the money is leaking, run your numbers in the cost-per-hire calculator, then see how flat-fee recruiting works. Sometimes the answer is slow the hire down, not hire us.